OVER 100 MORE examples of Fox News Bias at www.youtube.com When Fox News business anchor Jenna Lee reported on the surge in the stock market during the first year of the presidency of Barack Obama, the biggest stock market gain in a president’s first year since before World War II, I knew Fox News would find some way to turn this good news into bad news for Obama and I was not disappointed as I show in this video. The clips of the analysis from Fox News business anchor Jenna Lee come from the program “Happening Now” broadcast January 20, 2010 (which I have not been able to find online). The clip of Obama Administration senior advisor David Axelrod comes from msnbc’s program “Hardballl with Chris Matthews” also broadcast January 20, 2010, available online at www.msnbc.msn.com The clip of Time editor-at-large Mark Halperin comes from nbc’s “Meet the Press” broadcast January 17, 2010, available online at www.msnbc.msn.com The clip of Fox News anchor Trace Gallagher comes from the program “Live Desk” broadcast January 21, 2010 (which I have not been able to find online).
Obama Market Surge as Fox News Reports It?
Keep up with the latest Obama news and information with Amazon's 6" Wireless reading device. Amazon are offering the best deal online and are offering a special discount for a limited period. Click here to take advantage of this amazing special offer
25 Responses to “Obama Market Surge as Fox News Reports It?”
Post a Response
-
-
Random Articles
- Barack Obama Is Against Cutting Troops in Afghanistan (Pravda)
- Barack Obama, Life-Like Figurine – Add a Historical Icon to Your Home (BlackNews.com)
- A Christmas Gift – President Barack Obama: In His Own Words, His Words – His Promises – The Speeches 2007+2008
- Barack Obama pollster tells Labour to concentrate fire on Tory ‘toffs’ (Times Online)
- Alex Jones Tv 2/2:Psychology Today Say’s”Alex Jones & 9/11 Truthers Suffer from Mental Instability?”
-
Recent Articles
- Obama on the Economy (Part 1) – Bloomberg
- Obama Calls Kanye a ‘Jackass’ — The Audio (MP3 Download)
- The Coming Obama’s World Order
- ‘Obama is new words, but old tricks as US acts like empire’
- Alledged Murder at Guantánamo’s Camp No, Cover-Up by Bush and Obama
- In Performance at the White House A Celebration of Music from the Civil Rights Movement
- Obama & Medvedev. Moscow Press Conference. July 6, 2009. Part 3
- Newt Gingrich: The Obama Administration’s Power Grab & Geithner’s Request For Dictatorial Power
- Obama Reacts to Taiwanese Lin Yu Chun Singing Whitney Houston
- Fox News Pushes Obama Oil Spill Conspiracy
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | May » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |
dhinge on April 5th, 2010 1:30 pm
@christo930 The Federal Reserve sucks and should go away, but they didn’t cause this mess; if they did it would have happened DECADES ago, not just a few years ago. It’s a total joke that we as a society support banks that are too big to fail when they are too stupid to survive.
If the government was causing the banks to fail, we would have heard about it before even the foreclosures started happening. Nope; all we heard was FORECLOSURES UP! GAS PRICES UP! BANKS FAILING!
majorpayne77 on April 5th, 2010 2:17 pm
@ hewhosmokeswomen and you’re a fucking asshole if you think Obama isn’t a libertarian
christo930 on April 5th, 2010 2:31 pm
@dhinge Gov played a much larger role in this mess than you realize. It starts with the federal reserve setting prices (the price of borrowing). It was Bush that bailed out the banking system, not Obama. The thing I dislike about Obama the most is that he is too much like Bush. Letting the banks go bust would have been much better in the long and medium run and if you don’t believe that I suggest you look up Japan.
dhinge on April 5th, 2010 3:01 pm
@christo930 OK, so apparently the recession is actually almost as bad as the Great Depression… thank you banks. Again, no evidence that letting the banks fail would somehow reduce the unemployment rate.
Sure, endless government spending is bad, but when its saving a tanking economy? You can thank Obama for applying the breaks on it, even if it wasn’t graceful. The problem was the banks, not the bailout. They SHOULD own them until they pay the money back.
blva888 on April 5th, 2010 3:55 pm
You show some graphs than!!!! And prove them wrong!!!
cameronsmith142 on April 5th, 2010 4:09 pm
Well it should be fair but Fox News won’t and will not be given credit unfortunatly. The stimulus bill that was passed helped many of Americans like my family were my mother needed he unemployment but Texas’s Rick Perry need the money (also hyprcritical) and seeing a 10% increase in April taxes by the bill! Thanks!
kbjami on April 5th, 2010 4:55 pm
I must say at least when he makes his videos and gives an argument towards something he puts up his sources and really does who the flaws of Fox News and their bias beautifully.
darkr0astedblend on April 5th, 2010 5:37 pm
Oh Keynesian lovers… Let the future generations pay.
christo930 on April 5th, 2010 6:29 pm
The U6 UE is around 18% and if you calculate the UE the same way they did it in the 1930’s it’s at 22%. You are comparing apples to oranges because the statistics are not the same. We are now in the 3rd year of the depression, still bleeding jobs every single month and Obama has handed trillions to the banks. If you think this has been good, wait till you see the next 2 years.
pujyboy on April 5th, 2010 7:13 pm
Mmm. That there is some Grade A snark. I wish I could can some and save it for my grand kids.
dhinge on April 5th, 2010 8:00 pm
The irony of the LiberalViewer is that the people who should be listening can’t understand his long sentences.
dhinge on April 5th, 2010 8:04 pm
@christo930 In what country are you living in? We would be at 25% unemployment if the banks failed like the last Great Depression. Tell me how our businesses would have benefited from their accounts disappearing… even the FDIC couldn’t bail them out. You can thank Obama for still having your 11% job.
christo930 on April 5th, 2010 8:13 pm
Biggest success? stabilized the economy? Are you fucking kidding me? Unemployment is over 17%, and STILL going up and you think he “stabilized the economy”?
What a dick!!
zxcvbnmjhgfdsa1 on April 5th, 2010 8:16 pm
wait they are consistent innability is good, doing things is bad, of course they didnt mention scott brown causing the drop!
LordRambo on April 5th, 2010 8:20 pm
More propaganda spewed from another mouthpiece for the reptile overlords!
Hewhosmokeswomen on April 5th, 2010 8:31 pm
@majorpayne77
You’re fucking retarded if you think Obama is a Libertarian.
mcbobbo on April 5th, 2010 8:32 pm
The underlying assumption that Obama kept us from tipping into another depression is largely false.
At best he has pushed it off to someone else’s reign, while simultaneously making it much, much worse.
You can’t bail out banks, underwrite healthcare, expand wars, and do other expensive things on debt alone.
You can use deficits and taxpayer dollars to do these things temporarily, but it is rather like paying your MasterCard bill with your Visa.
painxtreme on April 5th, 2010 9:09 pm
There you have the results of being raised by an English Major. Looking at it, i should have put a haha in there, because I didn’t do it maliciously, thats one of my Mom’s lines when someone uses a double negative. You are right also about politician ownership. I dont go the Libertarian path, but I do admire Ron Paul’s candor.
xxxchaindrive on April 5th, 2010 9:23 pm
Ever so sorry, I attempted to write “I don’t believe any of them”, but ran up against the 500 word limit, which is completely non-conducive to completely coherent wording, so I re-worded it in such a way as be somewhat legible and comprehensive.
I completely apologies, and pray you don’t dispatch the internet grammar police to hunt me down and assault me in some way
painxtreme on April 5th, 2010 10:00 pm
I don’t believe none.
and…there ain’t not sumthing i wouldn’t do for no 20 bucks.
can you top a quadruple negative?
painxtreme on April 5th, 2010 10:15 pm
Ok, first, I dont have a problem with the existence of fox, they should be able to say whatever they like under the 1st amendment. Having said that, considering newspapers cannot cal themselves a newspaper, if they include either; a: too much editorial content and b: too much advertising material. It is fine, once again for fox to exist, but who is anyone trying to fool, saying this is a news organization? All they have is editorial, even in their supposed “hard news” segments.
xxxchaindrive on April 5th, 2010 11:01 pm
Obama, like almost all other politicians of today, is a corporatist, vying for more governmental intrusions into our lives for “our own good”. Us libertarians tend to despise corporatism, and governmental interference into almost everything, especially our lives.
hellboundmatt on April 5th, 2010 11:37 pm
Obama’s views match closer to a libertarian. Obama is a “moderate” He is NOT a liberal.
bryarcole4 on April 5th, 2010 11:47 pm
yah you think the “liberal media” would be all over that..
hoplite246 on April 6th, 2010 12:10 am
amen to that